![]() In addition, reactivity always contains a scale of intensity: changing our behavior by remembering a teacher to whom we owe a lot is not the same as doing it when we know that thousands of people are watching us through a television camera. Therefore, it is difficult to control and study, since the imagination has a role in it, and it can not be modified in a predictable way from the outside of the individual. That is why psychological reactivity is a complex phenomenon, which depends as much on how we perceive our environment as on cognitive elements and our imagination. ![]() It is this phenomenon that makes, for example, Social Psychology not only study the influence that others have on the person, but also the influence they have on these imaginary entities that are perceived as real or partially real in the here and now. But neither is it necessary for this belief to be very firm the simple act of evoking a person we want to make a good impression on can make us, without realizing it, behave somewhat more like we would if that person were really watching us. So that, it is possible that psychological reactivity appears at times when we are alone, if we come to believe that there are disembodied entities that look at us, something typical of magical thinking. What matters is the fact of being aware that someone is watching us, not so much our physical proximity to other people who might see us. In fact, reactivity may not exist in contexts in which we are surrounded by many people, precisely because the fact of being in a busy place can make us think that nobody is going to notice us. The presence or absence of psychological reactivity makes us behave in one way or another, be alone or accompanied. In psychology, reactivity is a concept that serves to designate the tendency of individuals to modify their behavior when they feel that someone is watching them. This, however, has a side effect called psychological reactivity. We, on the other hand, are social not only because we live collectively, but also because we think about the mental states of others. Just as social insects like ants can live in large colonies, they are not aware of this: they lack the ability to imagine the concept of the "other" and "oneself". ![]() But the social character of our species is very different from that of other forms of life. ![]() I discuss these findings in relation to stress theory, stress-reduction interventions, and methodological innovations.The human being is fundamentally a social animal, and that makes him adapt his behavior depending on the social context in which he finds himself. Interestingly, both studies also found that situation-level variables mattered relatively more than the other two types of variables. Moreover, all three types of variables emerged as important, as each factor contributed at least 20% of the overall variability in stress reactivity. Results from both studies suggest that these three types of variables account for the bulk, at least 70%, of stress reactivity in daily life. study self-reported their reactivity to stressful situations encountered on each of eight days. In Study 2, 955 adults from the Midlife in the U.S. In Study 1, 368 undergraduate college students reacted to 60 unique situations in the context of normal daily life on two separate occasions. My dissertation reconciles these perspectives by leveraging crossed random effect modeling to determine the percent of stress reactivity attributable to each of these types of variables the person, the situation, and the person-by-situation interaction. Researchers from a more integrative perspective assert that stress reactivity depends on an idiosyncratic interaction between person-level and stressor-level variables, for example the finding that lonely people are especially reactive to interpersonal tension. On one side, some argue that stress reactivity depends mostly on person-level variables, such as personality, while others contend that stress reactivity depends mostly on situation-level variables, for example chronicity. 2022 Theses Doctoral A Componential Model of Stress Reactivity in Daily LifeÄespite widespread agreement about the importance of stress for health and well-being, scholars disagree about the types of variables that matter most. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |